In Shabbos day Shemoneh Esrei, we describe Moshe receiving the Mitzvah of Shabbos on Har Sinai. It says that he received the Luchos, on which were written the Mitzvah of Shabbos, 'and so too is it written.' Then the brachah jumps to V'Shamru, which was indeed told to Moshe when he was on Har Sinai following Matan Torah but was not written on the Luchos. Why does the brachah not quote Zachor? If it introduces the quote by saying 'Shabbos is on the Luchos, as it says.'

Why doesn't it quote Shabbos on the Luchos? יִשְׂמַח מֹשֶׁה בְּמַתְּנַת חֶלְקוֹ כִּי עֶבֶד נֶאֱמָן קָרָאת לו כְּלִיל תִּפְאֶרֶת בְּרֹאשׁוֹ נָתַתָּ בְּעָומְדוֹ לְפָנֶיךָ עַל הַר סִינָי וּשְׁנֵי לוּחוֹת אֲבָנִים הוֹרִיד לָנוּ בְיָדוֹ וְכָתוּב בָּהֶן שְׁמִירַת שַׁבּת וְכן כָתוּב בְּתוֹרתך וְשָׁמְר֥וּ בְנֵֽי־יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל אֶת־הַשַּׁבָּ֑ת לַעֲשׂ֧וֹת אֶת־הַשַּׁבָּ֛ת לְדֹרֹתָ֖ם בְּרִ֥ית עוֹלָֽם בֵּינִ֗י וּבֵין֙ בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל א֥וֹת הִ֖וא לְעֹלָ֑ם כִּי־שֵׁ֣שֶׁת יָמִ֗ים עָשָׂ֤ה ה׳ אֶת־הַשָּׁמַ֣יִם וְאֶת־הָאָ֔רֶץ וּבַיּוֹם֙ הַשְּׁבִיעִ֔י שָׁבַ֖ת וַיִּנָּפַֽשׁ. The Yismach Moshe section of the prayer leads to VeShamru, which is taken from:16 to 17. (Our discussion will involve a few more sentences, Exodus 31:13 to 17.) Rabbi Avudirham this section of the prayer. He notes (in my own translation): They instituted the recital of “Moshe rejoiced” on Shabbos because of the first chapter of Tractate Shabbos (10b) [quoting Ex.

31:13]: “To make known that I HaShem have sanctified you.” The Holy One Blessed Be He said to Moshe, “I have a good gift in my treasury, called ‘Shabbos,’ and I want to give it to Israel. Go let them know.” That’s why they instituted [this section -- to make known] that Moshe rejoiced in this good gift of Shabbos that was put into his hand. The gemara that R’ Avudirham mentions (Shabbos 10b, like the similar statement at Beitza 16a2) discusses the proper way to give gifts. It refers to a couple of consecutive sentences of Exodus Ch.

31, including 31:13 which R’ Avudirham quotes in turn, to illustrate that when you give a gift you should let the recipient know, just as Hashem caused Moshe's face to shine when giving the Luchois to him and to the Jewish people to make known that HaShem has sanctified us. For example, when feeding a friend’s child in the absence of the parents, one might put cosmetics on his face so that his parents will ask him to explain what happened (a strange example to us, but apparently a familiar one to them). The flow of thought in Ex. 31 and the gemara are somewhat like that in these two paragraphs of the siddur. Moshe rejoiced in the gift of his portion, and You [haShem] placed a crown of splendor on Moshe’s head [the radiance of his face] and gave him the tables. So (assuming that the gemara predates this prayer) I would suggest that the author of the prayer was resonating this gemara obliquely. In other words, despite the placement of the words Vechein Kosuv Besoirasecha, the passage is not cited to prove that Shabbos is commanded on the Luchois.

It is rather meant to connect us to this sublime thought of the sages. The radiance of Moshe’s face reminded his generation that Shabbos is a beautiful gift to the Jewish people, and by recalling this exposition we are ourselves reminded that Shabbos is a beautiful gift to the Jewish people. The siddur then proceeds to cite a commandment to observe Shabbos from this same context, Exodus Ch. @Moses613 I wondered about these points.

I don't know whether the gemara predates the prayer, or whether the order is important. It's easier to explain the thought if we assume some order; but maybe the authors of the gemara and the siddur just assumed some familiarity with the exposition of Ex. 31, regardless of which of them did so first. The wording Vechein Kosuv is a little strange, I agree, but I believe such 'strange' things (flawed quotations) are common in the gemara.

1.0 /esli-moya-mashina-vam-meshaet-pozvonite-skachat-shablon/ 2017-07-13.

Maybe the author just meant to indicate a quotation, or meant to use Veshomru to illustrate Yismach more generally. – May 9 '17 at 14:35. Zachor is of course part of the Ten Commandments.

In his article on the Ten Commandments writes: In the second Bais Hamikdash, the practice was to recite the aseres hadibros each morning at the conclusion of shacharis. After the destruction of the second Bais Hamikdash, a suggestion was made that we introduce this practice all over the world as well. The idea was not accepted by the rabbonim lest the masses be misled into believing that there is something more important about these pesukim than the rest of the Torah.

I cannot patch operation flashpoint: cold war crisis. Operation flashpoint cold war crisis no cd crack. Download the patches. I am trying to patch it v1.00 to v1.20 but when i click on the OFPPatch.exe it came out a box wrote 'Please insert the correct CD-ROM, select OK and restart application'.

There is a widespread practice to draw a design of the two tablets on the paroches or on the aron kodesh. One of the great Hungarian gedolim of the last century wrote that he thinks that this must have been introduced by the Reform movement. Orthodox practice is that we don't place more significance to the aseres ha'dibros than to the rest of the Torah. I suggest that this is why the Amidah studiously avoids quoting Zachor.